2024年12月24日 星期二 新京报
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
。业内人士推荐91视频作为进阶阅读
Последние новости
这种 Agentic Coding 的模式，正在将开发者从繁琐的样板代码中解放出来，让我们能够专注于更高维度的产品逻辑与架构设计。。业内人士推荐谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】作为进阶阅读
德国工业设计师迪特 · 拉姆斯：做得更少，但更好
你须根据活动介绍和报名表的要求，提供真实、准确、完整的个人资料与体验计划。如存在不实信息，少数派保留取消资格和奖项的权利。。业内人士推荐WPS下载最新地址作为进阶阅读